|
THE ANTI-MATTER ASYMETRY PROBLEM Another one of science’s possible mysteries relates to the apparent imbalance between matter and anti-matter and potentially how our universe could even exist at all. So like most the other topics we have covered so far when we put everything into perspective to try to understand the true nature of space and time and mass and energy inside an infinite Universe we again see another simple solution to a reported paradox. To paraphrase the issue at hand, the Dirac equation predicted equal amounts of both matter and oppositely charged matter that we call anti-matter. Not long after the prediction was made empirical evidence began to show us this truth to our reality. That truth is that we have positively charged electrons and negatively charged protons and inside of quarks where there are certain balances they are reversed in antimatter. When antimatter comes in contact with matter it quickly turns back into energy and the matter and antimatter are annihilated. The paradox and mystery surround the predictions that the early formation of our visible portion of the universe should not have been able to take place because the initial energy should have come in equal amounts of both matter and anti-matter. Lots of assorted theories have tried to reconcile this issue and the real answer is that our visible section of the universe had more “matter” than antimatter when it first started so after all the annihilation of matter and antimatter occurred what was left over was more matter than antimatter and so our visible universe has negative electrons and positive protons and things we know as positrons which are measured, not theoretical, subatomic particles of antimatter. We can isolate and measure antimatter but without containment by non-material means it would not last very long. So lets put this concept into the framework we have already developed over the first 21 guides and see how this proposed paradox really fits into the grand structure of The Universe, not just our visible section of it. To do that maybe a quick recap is in order because how anti-matter fits into things is really tied to the true catalyst for our big bang. If you are not up to speed on SCT , Successive Collision Theory , then I strongly suggest going through the earlier guides if you really want to understand what came before the big bang and what caused our big bang. But to summarize, if we accept the premise of an infinite Universe then our visible universe becomes the largest measurable pocket of relative spacetime massenergy of the multiple nested levels of pockets that we can see. Again, a pocket forms when celestial objects play follow the leader because multiple objects that follow the most massive objects on their journey inherit a shared perception of space and time. Every cohesive group of objects sharing the same relative trajectory and relative velocity share the same perception of space and time and are considered a relative pocket of spacetime massenergy. Every one of these pockets ALWAYS has a parent frame of reference and there is a nested succession of larger and larger frames of reference each frame containing one or more bodies where every body could be a single object or another cohesive pocket of objects with their own relative trajectories and velocities. Each child object always obtains it base perception of space and time from that parent pocket but in turn its own relative speed and the multiple gravitational fields it passes through all determine how each child in turn perceives space and time and then passes that perception onto its own child objects. Our solar system and every planetary system is a pocket of relative spacetime massenergy inside a parent galaxy inside a parent cluster inside a parent supercluster inside sometimes a parent filament or potentially then just inside the visible universe itself. Well there is ZERO reason to expect or predict that our visible universe is alone inside a vast and infinite spacetime and much more likely has siblings sharing a parent frame that in turn has siblings sharing a larger frame of reference inside an increasingly larger and larger pocket of relative spacetime massenergy. If you are with me so far that means that our visible universe has a speed relative to its parent frame and likely an axis of rotation and speed of rotation and it may have a period of revolution or it may have satellites. Or it could even be on a direct collection course with another pocket because that is the true nature of space time. Endless collisions of pockets of all different scale factors. A Universe always in flux and always evolving and always seeing pockets collide where new pockets are then created. There have been an infinite number of collisions of pockets of all different scale factors long before the series of high speed collisions that directly led to the creation of our visible universe and so the key thing to realize here is that each parent frame of reference we tack on adds some marginal increase in our relative speed as it relates to that pocket’s parent frame. The Earth’s speed around the sun pales in comparison to the relative speed of our planet when we take into the account the Sun’s speed and the Milky Way’s speed, and speed of the parent cluster/superclusters relative to the CMB. The 30 km/s we perceive as motion relative to the other objects inside our solar system is less than a tenth and possibly as much as a twentieth of the estimated total aggregate speed that has been approximated at 500 km/s plus or minus 100 km/s. That means in the time it took you to read this much of the sentence each of us has moved through space time further than the entire length of the Grand Canyon. But since our universe has a parent and that parent has a parent then with each successive parent frame of reference we usually increase our total aggregate relative speed. So when we say that an infinite number of collisions have occurred at all different scale factors we need to think about what happens when those collisions occur between two pockets that are very far removed from us before they share the same parent frame of reference. The further removed two pockets are from our scale factor when they collide the greater the relative speed of collisions. It is this principle that helps explain our big bang and if you knew all this stuff already then please bear with me as it is all very key to the points I wanted to make about the anti-matter paradox. So we can have collisions where the number of nested parent frames of references above our scale factor are hundreds of thousands and potentially even millions of nested levels removed from us. It is the nature of space time for mass and energy to bind to spacetime as cohesive pockets and gravity and inertia and angular momentum all come into play as the scale factor increases and the size of the cohesive pockets of bodies sharing the same perception of space and time and relative trajectory and speed will grow in scale factor and with each nested parent frame of reference comes some marginal increase ( or decrease sometimes ) in our planet’s relative speed. But in general the marginal increases occur as we go up from parent to parent but there will be an upper limit. We already know the speed limit of mass and that is the speed of light and so if we continue up far enough, we find that parent frame that finally sees us moving at the speed of light. This is tough to imagine that our planet is moving at the speed of light (being all massive and everything) but once you really grasp how relativity works and the nature of space time then it all fits together and so when we have collisions of two pockets so far removed from us the relative speed of impact could in fact exceed the speed of light and we can have collisions taking place and 1.5 or 1.8 or even sometimes 1.9 times the speed of light. When that happens there can be millions of collisions and those localized collisions of vaporized matter that immediately turn into hot spinning eddies of pure energy before cooling into a quark gluon plasma begin the process of again learning to play follow the leader as successions of nested pockets form. The two pockets that collided may have grazed each other and went upon their prior courses with a small number of new pockets created or they may have collided more head on and created thousands of siblings to our visible universe. There are many predictions of SCT that have been observed and so if you want to see all the supporting evidence for Successive Collision Theory I suggest going back through the guides if you never took the time to read them yet. But just like how the two pockets themselves could cross paths in different ways so could all the difference child objects inside those pockets that actually collide. The random nature of these collisions produce the predictions we have observed like shared axis of rotations of galaxies and quasars from all different parts of the universe, similar speed of rotation of all different galaxies, random nature of clockwise and counterclockwise spins, and most importantly, supervoids and super filaments. Each of these predictions of SCT are observed and in some cases pose a problem for cosmologists still hugging onto a singularity as the source for all the mass in the universe. But this is where the anti-matter paradox really is not a paradox at all. We know that when the matter annihilates due to superluminal collisions and then cools to reform quark gluon plasma that Dirac predicted, and we would expect matter and antimatter to be created and they are. But in the very initial first moments the energy is at such high temperatures there are going to be minor fluctuations and density distribution differences where as it cooled to form electrons and positrons and charged quarks after the matter/antimatter annihilations are over whichever one had a higher localized density distribution would end up the winner and so we get a pocket of relative spacetime massenergy just like ours but who is to say that one or more of our siblings created at the same time might not have then had a higher density distribution of antimatter and ended up oppositely charged. That is how Dirac’s predicted behavior is to be expected to manifest. And inside that pocket there would be ZERO difference related to the laws of physics and chemistry and biology ( as it relates to the charges inside the atoms) (there could most definitely be pockets that use different constants but the same laws and so there could be differences in the sciences but not due to charge) . What we think of as a negative charge verses the antimatter equivalent means nothing inside the pocket of one or the other. You could not tell the difference inside the pocket whether you were in a universe made from matter or antimatter but for the most part it would be one or the other. Could there still be a small pocket of antimatter floating around inside our universe? Probably not, it would likely annihilate just by coming into contact with vacuum energy so very likely we fine all objects inside a pockets created from the same set of successive collisions would likely be all matter or all anti-matter. It is not really that ours is negative and theirs is positive but more so really that ours has predicted charges for electrons and protons and theirs is just the opposite of our charge. But here is where it gets interesting so those who stuck around to the end I hope you enjoy this. We had mentioned how when two pockets collide all the subcollisions could have objects grazing the left side or right side of their partner and creating opposite spin in the resulting eddy of energy but some collisions would hit head on and all the kinetic energy due to the relative speed of a collision approaching 2C instead of moving some of it to the resulting angular moment , much more relative kinetic energy is converted to heat and energy release. And now we add the new variable to equation. Some of these collisions could occur between two pockets of matter or two pockets of antimatter and in theory there exists the probability that some of these collisions could occur between a pocket of matter and a pocket of antimatter. So besides my prediction that we will see the evolution of a new branch of superluminal physics and the math that goes with a grand set of equations to be created to define the specific collision pairs that created our visible universe, I think we will also see a set of formulas evolve for high speed collisions between matter and antimatter and how the resulting eddies of hot quark gluon plasma might be different from those collisions of the same form. In theory an even greater amount of energy could be released than the massive amount we get when two black holes collide at 1.9C. What would the energy and heat output be of two massive black holes colliding at 1.9C but one is matter and one is anti-matter? I proposed that there was not a single singularity that caused our big bang but there may have been thousands or maybe tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of separate singularities involved in the collisions. BUT if over time all the math and formulas in turn determine that in fact there was a single singularity and not a succession, then it could have been EITHER a faster than light collision of two massive black holes OR it could have been the collisions of two massive black holes not approaching relative speeds faster than the speed of light but instead one being matter and the other being antimatter. One of those two reasons would be the only other possible cause for our visible universe if someday it was shown that in fact there were not successive collisions. But I think once we take into account the mounds of supporting evidence presented already I would be very surprised if the only thing science took away from understanding the true nature of space time was that collision(s) are the much more logical catalyst for our big bang. We leaned towards a singularity because we saw all things moving away but once we realize the expansion is caused by the dissipating gravitational binding of mass energy to spacetime of successive parent frames of reference that in turn is causing the perceived tearing apart of our own spacetime we in turn no longer need a singularity to explain the perceived expansion and so our CMB may have formed 380,000 days or weeks after the collisions took place and not the 380,000 years it would take if some crazy unimaginable temperature of 10^35K could even be created by any type of physical process. Instead we could have had temperatures of trillions or hundreds of billions of degrees kelvin and all within a localized area could have seen similar initial conditions across a wide span of space time and had time to mix and dissipate to get very close in temperatures as it cooled enough for recombination. We needed faster than light inflation when we tried to explain homogeneity at the size of the CMB starting from a tiny small space but when we realize the CMB formed much sooner after the initial collisions than we estimated because it was not a small span of space that was involved. #thenaturalstateofnature
All the darkness in the entire vast multiverse can not defeat the flame of a single candle.
|